CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board denied defendant's petition for removal, upholding the WCJ's order allowing the deposition of the Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME), Dr. Berman. Defendant argued the deposition was improper because Dr. Berman's prior reports were stricken from the record. However, the Board found no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, noting the order permitted further record development. The Board clarified that even if Dr. Berman's reports were considered stricken, the WCJ could still develop the record by seeking supplemental information from the AME.
ROSS ISAACS vs. DOUG APATOW AGENCY, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board denied defendant's petition for removal, upholding the WCJ's order allowing the deposition of the Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME), Dr. Berman. Defendant argued the deposition was improper because Dr. Berman's prior reports were stricken from the record. However, the Board found no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, noting the order permitted further record development. The Board clarified that even if Dr. Berman's reports were considered stricken, the WCJ could still develop the record by seeking supplemental information from the AME.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.