CompFox AI Summary
In Villarino v. Surety Property, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the Applicant's Petition for Reconsideration as untimely. The WCAB adopted the administrative law judge's report, finding the petition was filed more than 25 days after the September 24, 2013, Findings of Fact and Award. Specifically, the petition exceeded the 20-day filing period plus 5 days for mail service. Had the petition been timely, the WCAB would have denied it on the merits, as indicated by the judge's report.
ROSIE VILLARINO vs. SURETY PROPERTY, AMERICAN CLAIMS SAN DIEGO, AMERICAN COMMERCIAL is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
In Villarino v. Surety Property, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the Applicant's Petition for Reconsideration as untimely. The WCAB adopted the administrative law judge's report, finding the petition was filed more than 25 days after the September 24, 2013, Findings of Fact and Award. Specifically, the petition exceeded the 20-day filing period plus 5 days for mail service. Had the petition been timely, the WCAB would have denied it on the merits, as indicated by the judge's report.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.