CompFox AI Summary
This case involves Rosemary Dominguez's petition for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board order. Dominguez, represented by counsel but filing her own petition, alleged her attorney committed fraud, had a conflict of interest, and that she didn't understand the documents she signed. The Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge's report, adopted by the Board, found no good cause for reconsideration. The petition was denied because the applicant's claims of misunderstanding and fraud could have been raised at the hearing, and no new evidence was presented.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves Rosemary Dominguez's petition for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board order. Dominguez, represented by counsel but filing her own petition, alleged her attorney committed fraud, had a conflict of interest, and that she didn't understand the documents she signed. The Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge's report, adopted by the Board, found no good cause for reconsideration. The petition was denied because the applicant's claims of misunderstanding and fraud could have been raised at the hearing, and no new evidence was presented.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.