Home/Case Law/ROSE SAMLER vs. JOHN GRUBE/ROBERT SCOTT, D.D.S., AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DR. JOHN ARGUELLES, NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ROSE SAMLER vs. JOHN GRUBE/ROBERT SCOTT, D.D.S., AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DR. JOHN ARGUELLES, NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION

Filed: Oct 15, 2007
San Francisco
GOL 94377, GOL 94518

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to correct a clerical error, identifying National Surety Corporation as the proper co-defendant instead of National Insurance Company. The Board affirmed the original award of 33% permanent disability and further medical treatment, but deferred the issues of temporary disability and the EDD lien claim. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company remains responsible for paying benefits, subject to pro rata reimbursement by National Surety Corporation.

ROSE SAMLER vs. JOHN GRUBE/ROBERT SCOTT, D.D.S., AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DR. JOHN ARGUELLES, NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to correct a clerical error, identifying National Surety Corporation as the proper co-defendant instead of "National Insurance Company." The Board affirmed the original award of 33% permanent disability and further medical treatment, but deferred the issues of temporary disability and the EDD lien claim. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company remains responsible for paying benefits, subject to pro rata reimbursement by National Surety Corporation.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ROSE SAMLER vs. JOHN GRUBE/ROBERT SCOTT, D.D.S., AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DR. JOHN ARGUELLES, NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ROSE SAMLER vs. JOHN GRUBE/ROBERT SCOTT, D.D.S., AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DR. JOHN ARGUELLES, NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ROSE SAMLER vs. JOHN GRUBE/ROBERT SCOTT, D.D.S., AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DR. JOHN ARGUELLES, NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION Case Analysis

ROSE SAMLER vs. JOHN GRUBE/ROBERT SCOTT, D.D.S., AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DR. JOHN ARGUELLES, NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ROSE SAMLER vs. JOHN GRUBE/ROBERT SCOTT, D.D.S., AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DR. JOHN ARGUELLES, NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION (2007) – San Francisco | CompFox | CompFox