Home/Case Law/ROSALIO AMBRIZ CARRANZA vs. SATICOY LEMON ASSOCIATION, YORK INSURANCE
Regular DecisionRemoval

ROSALIO AMBRIZ CARRANZA vs. SATICOY LEMON ASSOCIATION, YORK INSURANCE

Filed: Sep 17, 2015
Santa Ana
ADJ8876878

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Removal. Removal is an extraordinary remedy requiring a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, which the petitioner failed to demonstrate. The Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning that the lien claimant was entitled to requested medical documents to prove their claim, and that the defendant's objections lacked merit and failed to show grounds for removal. Therefore, the petition was denied as the applicant's case was resolved, and reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if issues arose later.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Removal. Removal is an extraordinary remedy requiring a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, which the petitioner failed to demonstrate. The Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning that the lien claimant was entitled to requested medical documents to prove their claim, and that the defendant's objections lacked merit and failed to show grounds for removal. Therefore, the petition was denied as the applicant's case was resolved, and reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if issues arose later.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ROSALIO AMBRIZ CARRANZA vs. SATICOY LEMON ASSOCIATION, YORK INSURANCE (2015) – Santa Ana | CompFox