CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, affirming the Administrative Law Judge's decision to apply the revised permanent disability rating schedule. This decision was based on the finding that the applicant was not permanent and stationary when the treating physician indicated a potential permanent disability, and therefore, no exception to the revised schedule applied. The Board also affirmed the WCJ's findings regarding temporary disability and the applicant's compliance with the Health Care Organization.
ROSALINDA ZUNIGA vs. GRIMMWAY ENTERPRISES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, affirming the Administrative Law Judge's decision to apply the revised permanent disability rating schedule. This decision was based on the finding that the applicant was not permanent and stationary when the treating physician indicated a potential permanent disability, and therefore, no exception to the revised schedule applied. The Board also affirmed the WCJ's findings regarding temporary disability and the applicant's compliance with the Health Care Organization.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.