CompFox AI Summary
This case involved an applicant's petition for reconsideration or removal related to a WCJ's Minute Order setting the case for trial. The Appeals Board dismissed the reconsideration petition because the order was an interlocutory procedural decision, not a final determination of substantive rights or liabilities. Furthermore, the removal petition was denied as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, and reconsideration remains an adequate remedy.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involved an applicant's petition for reconsideration or removal related to a WCJ's Minute Order setting the case for trial. The Appeals Board dismissed the reconsideration petition because the order was an interlocutory procedural decision, not a final determination of substantive rights or liabilities. Furthermore, the removal petition was denied as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, and reconsideration remains an adequate remedy.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.