Home/Case Law/ROSABETH DORFHUBER vs. MICHAEL\'S STORES, GALLAGHER BASSETT
Regular DecisionRemoval

ROSABETH DORFHUBER vs. MICHAEL\'S STORES, GALLAGHER BASSETT

Filed: Aug 20, 2018
San Bernardino
ADJ10994100

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Rosabeth Dorfhuber's Petition for Removal. The Board stated that removal is an extraordinary remedy granted only upon a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, which was not demonstrated here. Furthermore, the Board found that reconsideration will be an adequate remedy should an adverse decision be issued later. The WCJ's analysis of the petitioner's arguments supported the denial.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Rosabeth Dorfhuber's Petition for Removal. The Board stated that removal is an extraordinary remedy granted only upon a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, which was not demonstrated here. Furthermore, the Board found that reconsideration will be an adequate remedy should an adverse decision be issued later. The WCJ's analysis of the petitioner's arguments supported the denial.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ROSABETH DORFHUBER vs. MICHAEL\'S STORES, GALLAGHER BASSETT (2018) – San Bernardino | CompFox