Home/Case Law/RONALD WECHSLER vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION, legally uninsured and adjusted by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

RONALD WECHSLER vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION, legally uninsured and adjusted by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Nov 12, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ388201

CompFox AI Summary

Defendant sought reconsideration of a prior WCAB decision that allowed applicant to reopen his case for increased permanent disability due to industrial hypertensive disease and resulting end-organ damage. Defendant argued that end-organ damage occurring outside the five-year limit from the date of injury barred recovery for new and further disability. The WCAB denied reconsideration, reaffirming that the parties' stipulation of injury to the cardiovascular system, including hypertension and end organ damage, was binding and encompassed the current claim. The case is returned to the WCJ for determination of the extent of the applicant's increased permanent disability.

RONALD WECHSLER vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION, legally uninsured and adjusted by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Defendant sought reconsideration of a prior WCAB decision that allowed applicant to reopen his case for increased permanent disability due to industrial hypertensive disease and resulting end-organ damage. Defendant argued that end-organ damage occurring outside the five-year limit from the date of injury barred recovery for new and further disability. The WCAB denied reconsideration, reaffirming that the parties' stipulation of injury to the cardiovascular system, including "hypertension and end organ damage," was binding and encompassed the current claim. The case is returned to the WCJ for determination of the extent of the applicant's increased permanent disability.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

RONALD WECHSLER vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION, legally uninsured and adjusted by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

RONALD WECHSLER vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION, legally uninsured and adjusted by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

RONALD WECHSLER vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION, legally uninsured and adjusted by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

RONALD WECHSLER vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION, legally uninsured and adjusted by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.