Home/Case Law/RONALD SOUSA vs. UNITED AIRLINES, GALLAGHER BASSETT
Regular DecisionReconsideration

RONALD SOUSA vs. UNITED AIRLINES, GALLAGHER BASSETT

Filed: Oct 26, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ3845030 (SFO 0486130) ADJ1146524 (SFO 0486131) ADJ3520732 (SFO 0486132)

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board denied the petition for reconsideration, upholding their previous decision that the repeal of Labor Code section 139.5 terminated the applicant's rights to vocational rehabilitation benefits.

RONALD SOUSA vs. UNITED AIRLINES, GALLAGHER BASSETT is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board denied the petition for reconsideration, upholding their previous decision that the repeal of Labor Code section 139.5 terminated the applicant's rights to vocational rehabilitation benefits.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

RONALD SOUSA vs. UNITED AIRLINES, GALLAGHER BASSETT workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

RONALD SOUSA vs. UNITED AIRLINES, GALLAGHER BASSETT case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

RONALD SOUSA vs. UNITED AIRLINES, GALLAGHER BASSETT Case Analysis

RONALD SOUSA vs. UNITED AIRLINES, GALLAGHER BASSETT is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.