Home/Case Law/RONALD HOGLUND vs. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND STATE EMPLOYEES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

RONALD HOGLUND vs. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND STATE EMPLOYEES

Filed: Apr 21, 2016
San Diego
ADJ8547650

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns Ronald Hoglund's claim for workers' compensation benefits due to prostate cancer, presumed industrial under Labor Code section 3212.1. The defendant, California Highway Patrol, sought reconsideration, arguing the injury date was incorrect, precluding the presumption, and disputing the permanent disability rating. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to clarify the employment period. Ultimately, the Board affirmed the award, modifying Finding of Fact No. 1 to reflect the applicant was employed by the CHP from June 1, 1970, through September 3, 2000.

RONALD HOGLUND vs. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND STATE EMPLOYEES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Diego. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Diego.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns Ronald Hoglund's claim for workers' compensation benefits due to prostate cancer, presumed industrial under Labor Code section 3212.1. The defendant, California Highway Patrol, sought reconsideration, arguing the injury date was incorrect, precluding the presumption, and disputing the permanent disability rating. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to clarify the employment period. Ultimately, the Board affirmed the award, modifying Finding of Fact No. 1 to reflect the applicant was employed by the CHP from June 1, 1970, through September 3, 2000.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

RONALD HOGLUND vs. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND STATE EMPLOYEES workers compensation case in San Diego. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

RONALD HOGLUND vs. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND STATE EMPLOYEES case law summary from San Diego. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

RONALD HOGLUND vs. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND STATE EMPLOYEES Case Analysis

RONALD HOGLUND vs. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND STATE EMPLOYEES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Diego. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.