Home/Case Law/ROMAN BELTRAN vs. PIEDMONT LUMBER & MILL COMPANY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionOpinion and Decision After Reconsideration

ROMAN BELTRAN vs. PIEDMONT LUMBER & MILL COMPANY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Apr 25, 2008
San Francisco
SRO 0132302 SRO 0137260 SRO 0137261

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns the application of Labor Code section 4658(d) to an injury occurring on May 10, 2004, after Senate Bill 899's enactment. The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's finding that because the employer did not offer a return-to-work plan for at least 12 months, the permanent disability indemnity payable from 60 days after the P&S date must be increased by 15%. This ruling clarifies that SB 899's provisions apply prospectively from its enactment date to injuries not specifically excluded by the legislation.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns the application of Labor Code section 4658(d) to an injury occurring on May 10, 2004, after Senate Bill 899's enactment. The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's finding that because the employer did not offer a return-to-work plan for at least 12 months, the permanent disability indemnity payable from 60 days after the P&S date must be increased by 15%. This ruling clarifies that SB 899's provisions apply prospectively from its enactment date to injuries not specifically excluded by the legislation.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ROMAN BELTRAN vs. PIEDMONT LUMBER & MILL COMPANY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND (2008) – San Francisco | CompFox