Home/Case Law/ROGER SCHENDEL vs. B&B SALES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ROGER SCHENDEL vs. B&B SALES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Nov 15, 2016
Marina Del Rey
ADJ3568698 (MON 0246436)

CompFox AI Summary

In this workers' compensation case, the applicant sought renewed prescriptions for Norco and Omeprazole. Defendant contested the award of these medications, arguing the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board lacked jurisdiction due to a timely Utilization Review (UR) denial upheld by Independent Medical Review (IMR). The Board denied reconsideration, affirming the WCJ's award based on a stipulation agreement that waived the UR/IMR process in favor of an Agreed Medical Examiner (AME). The majority found defendant bound by the stipulation to abide by the AME's report, which deemed the prescriptions medically appropriate. A dissenting opinion argued the AME's report was insufficient for an award as it was not based on a current examination or complete review of the applicant's medical records.

ROGER SCHENDEL vs. B&B SALES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Marina Del Rey. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Marina Del Rey.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

In this workers' compensation case, the applicant sought renewed prescriptions for Norco and Omeprazole. Defendant contested the award of these medications, arguing the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board lacked jurisdiction due to a timely Utilization Review (UR) denial upheld by Independent Medical Review (IMR). The Board denied reconsideration, affirming the WCJ's award based on a stipulation agreement that waived the UR/IMR process in favor of an Agreed Medical Examiner (AME). The majority found defendant bound by the stipulation to abide by the AME's report, which deemed the prescriptions medically appropriate. A dissenting opinion argued the AME's report was insufficient for an award as it was not based on a current examination or complete review of the applicant's medical records.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ROGER SCHENDEL vs. B&B SALES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in Marina Del Rey. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ROGER SCHENDEL vs. B&B SALES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from Marina Del Rey. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ROGER SCHENDEL vs. B&B SALES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

ROGER SCHENDEL vs. B&B SALES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Marina Del Rey. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.