Home/Case Law/ROGER LUTHER vs. CITY OF RIVERSIDE
Regular DecisionRemoval Petition

ROGER LUTHER vs. CITY OF RIVERSIDE

Filed: Jul 09, 2012
Riverside
ADJ6610181

CompFox AI Summary

Curtis W. Montgomery Chiropractic Corporation filed a Petition for Removal challenging an order continuing a case to a mandatory settlement conference. The Appeals Board dismissed the petition because Montgomery failed to demonstrate prejudice, did not serve the applicant, and importantly, has not filed a lien to invoke the Board's jurisdiction over his reimbursement claim. Consequently, his petition for removal is dismissed, and sanctions are not addressed.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Curtis W. Montgomery Chiropractic Corporation filed a Petition for Removal challenging an order continuing a case to a mandatory settlement conference. The Appeals Board dismissed the petition because Montgomery failed to demonstrate prejudice, did not serve the applicant, and importantly, has not filed a lien to invoke the Board's jurisdiction over his reimbursement claim. Consequently, his petition for removal is dismissed, and sanctions are not addressed.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ROGER LUTHER vs. CITY OF RIVERSIDE (2012) – Riverside | CompFox