CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Roger Goodman's petition for reconsideration because it was not filed from a final order as required by statute, but rather from an interlocutory procedural or evidentiary decision. The Board also denied Goodman's petition for removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm that reconsideration would not adequately address. Therefore, the Board found both the reconsideration and removal petitions to be without merit.
ROGER GOODMAN vs. BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. is a workers' compensation case decided in Bakersfield. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Bakersfield.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Roger Goodman's petition for reconsideration because it was not filed from a "final" order as required by statute, but rather from an interlocutory procedural or evidentiary decision. The Board also denied Goodman's petition for removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm that reconsideration would not adequately address. Therefore, the Board found both the reconsideration and removal petitions to be without merit.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.