Home/Case Law/ROGENE SAMFORD vs. SILICON MAPS
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ROGENE SAMFORD vs. SILICON MAPS

Filed: Sep 03, 2013
Oakland
ADJ7451542

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves Rogene Samford's petition for reconsideration of a Finding of Fact denying her workers' compensation claim against Silicon Maps. The administrative law judge found that Samford's alleged injury did not occur in the course of her employment. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, adopting the judge's reasoning that injuries sustained during unpaid, off-premises lunch periods are generally not compensable. The Board also noted deficiencies in the applicant's petition, including a lack of specific record references and factual assertions unsupported by evidence.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves Rogene Samford's petition for reconsideration of a Finding of Fact denying her workers' compensation claim against Silicon Maps. The administrative law judge found that Samford's alleged injury did not occur in the course of her employment. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, adopting the judge's reasoning that injuries sustained during unpaid, off-premises lunch periods are generally not compensable. The Board also noted deficiencies in the applicant's petition, including a lack of specific record references and factual assertions unsupported by evidence.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.