Home/Case Law/ROBIN GOEBEL vs. MCDONALD'S, EMPLOYERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ROBIN GOEBEL vs. MCDONALD'S, EMPLOYERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Jul 11, 2016
Santa Rosa
ADJ9956461

CompFox AI Summary

In this workers' compensation case, the defendant, McDonald's, sought reconsideration of a prior award finding applicant Robin Goebel sustained an industrial injury to her back and left knee. The administrative law judge had found the defendant failed to timely complete utilization review (UR) for requested medical treatment. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, affirming the finding of untimely UR. However, the Board deferred the issue of medical necessity for the requested treatment, allowing for further development of the record on that point.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

In this workers' compensation case, the defendant, McDonald's, sought reconsideration of a prior award finding applicant Robin Goebel sustained an industrial injury to her back and left knee. The administrative law judge had found the defendant failed to timely complete utilization review (UR) for requested medical treatment. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, affirming the finding of untimely UR. However, the Board deferred the issue of medical necessity for the requested treatment, allowing for further development of the record on that point.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ROBIN GOEBEL vs. MCDONALD'S, EMPLOYERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY (2016) – Santa Rosa | CompFox