Home/Case Law/ROBERTO PINEDA vs. CIRCUIT CITY, CIRCUIT CITY SELFINSURED SECURITY FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ROBERTO PINEDA vs. CIRCUIT CITY, CIRCUIT CITY SELFINSURED SECURITY FUND

Filed: Oct 29, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ3362266 (LAO 0805454)

CompFox AI Summary

The WCAB dismissed Shandler & Associates' petition for reconsideration because it was filed against an interlocutory order (Notice of Intent to Dismiss Liens), not a final order. Even if treated as a removal petition, it was denied due to a lack of demonstrated significant prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board, however, removed the case on its own motion to consider sanctions against Shandler & Associates for filing a frivolous petition. Sanctions of $250.00 are proposed for bad-faith litigation tactics, payable to the General Fund.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The WCAB dismissed Shandler & Associates' petition for reconsideration because it was filed against an interlocutory order (Notice of Intent to Dismiss Liens), not a final order. Even if treated as a removal petition, it was denied due to a lack of demonstrated significant prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board, however, removed the case on its own motion to consider sanctions against Shandler & Associates for filing a frivolous petition. Sanctions of $250.00 are proposed for bad-faith litigation tactics, payable to the General Fund.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ROBERTO PINEDA vs. CIRCUIT CITY, CIRCUIT CITY SELFINSURED SECURITY FUND (2010) – San Francisco | CompFox