Home/Case Law/ROBERTA BINGHAM vs. JACK COOPER TRANSP.; and ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

ROBERTA BINGHAM vs. JACK COOPER TRANSP.; and ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Feb 26, 2012
San Francisco
ADJ7218172

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a petition for removal filed by the defendant, Jack Cooper Transport and Zurich American Insurance Company. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied this petition, adopting the reasoning of the workers' compensation administrative law judge. The WCAB specifically noted that the defendant's vocational rehabilitation expert's direct testimony may be restricted at trial under Labor Code section 5703(j) unless good cause is shown. Therefore, the matter remains set for hearing.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a petition for removal filed by the defendant, Jack Cooper Transport and Zurich American Insurance Company. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied this petition, adopting the reasoning of the workers' compensation administrative law judge. The WCAB specifically noted that the defendant's vocational rehabilitation expert's direct testimony may be restricted at trial under Labor Code section 5703(j) unless good cause is shown. Therefore, the matter remains set for hearing.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ROBERTA BINGHAM vs. JACK COOPER TRANSP.; and ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY (2012) – San Francisco | CompFox