Home/Case Law/ROBERT STANIFER vs. CHICAGO CUBS; WASHINGTON NATIONALS aka MONTREAL EXPOS; ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY/CHUBB;BOSTON RED SOX; TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

ROBERT STANIFER vs. CHICAGO CUBS; WASHINGTON NATIONALS aka MONTREAL EXPOS; ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY/CHUBB;BOSTON RED SOX; TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Nov 08, 2018
Santa Ana
ADJ9094930

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) affirmed the decision to deny applicant's claim for cumulative trauma injury, finding insufficient connection to California. While applicant claimed to be hired in California by Hiroshima Toyo Carp, that employer is not a party, precluding jurisdiction under Labor Code Section 5305. The WCAB determined that applicant's participation in 12 games in California out of 440 total games over 11 seasons was de minimis and insufficient to overcome defendants' due process objection. Therefore, the minimal contact with California did not justify requiring defendants to litigate the claim in this state.

ROBERT STANIFER vs. CHICAGO CUBS; WASHINGTON NATIONALS aka MONTREAL EXPOS; ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY/CHUBB;BOSTON RED SOX; TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in Santa Ana. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Santa Ana.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) affirmed the decision to deny applicant's claim for cumulative trauma injury, finding insufficient connection to California. While applicant claimed to be hired in California by Hiroshima Toyo Carp, that employer is not a party, precluding jurisdiction under Labor Code Section 5305. The WCAB determined that applicant's participation in 12 games in California out of 440 total games over 11 seasons was de minimis and insufficient to overcome defendants' due process objection. Therefore, the minimal contact with California did not justify requiring defendants to litigate the claim in this state.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ROBERT STANIFER vs. CHICAGO CUBS; WASHINGTON NATIONALS aka MONTREAL EXPOS; ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY/CHUBB;BOSTON RED SOX; TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY workers compensation case in Santa Ana. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ROBERT STANIFER vs. CHICAGO CUBS; WASHINGTON NATIONALS aka MONTREAL EXPOS; ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY/CHUBB;BOSTON RED SOX; TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY case law summary from Santa Ana. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ROBERT STANIFER vs. CHICAGO CUBS; WASHINGTON NATIONALS aka MONTREAL EXPOS; ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY/CHUBB;BOSTON RED SOX; TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY Case Analysis

ROBERT STANIFER vs. CHICAGO CUBS; WASHINGTON NATIONALS aka MONTREAL EXPOS; ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY/CHUBB;BOSTON RED SOX; TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Santa Ana. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.