Home/Case Law/ROBERT ROGERS vs. ALBERTSON'S/SUPERVALU, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

ROBERT ROGERS vs. ALBERTSON'S/SUPERVALU, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

Filed: Feb 19, 2015
San Francisco
ADJ918266 (SFO 0488680), ADJ569020 (SFO 0488681), ADJ977111 (SFO 0488682), ADJ182039 (SFO 0413989)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves multiple workers' compensation claims filed by Robert Rogers against Albertson's/Supervalu. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has issued an order dismissing the petitioner's Petition for Removal. This dismissal is solely due to the petitioner having withdrawn their own petition. Therefore, the Board is acting to formally close the removal process as requested.

ROBERT ROGERS vs. ALBERTSON'S/SUPERVALU, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves multiple workers' compensation claims filed by Robert Rogers against Albertson's/Supervalu. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has issued an order dismissing the petitioner's Petition for Removal. This dismissal is solely due to the petitioner having withdrawn their own petition. Therefore, the Board is acting to formally close the removal process as requested.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ROBERT ROGERS vs. ALBERTSON'S/SUPERVALU, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ROBERT ROGERS vs. ALBERTSON'S/SUPERVALU, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ROBERT ROGERS vs. ALBERTSON'S/SUPERVALU, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. Case Analysis

ROBERT ROGERS vs. ALBERTSON'S/SUPERVALU, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.