CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed a lien claimant's petition for reconsideration because it was not properly served on the defendant. The lien claimant contended the judge erred in ordering documentation, discounting medical opinions, determining payment based on the fee schedule, and failing to award penalties for delayed payment. Even if the service defect hadn't occurred, the Board would have denied the petition on its merits based on the judge's report.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed a lien claimant's petition for reconsideration because it was not properly served on the defendant. The lien claimant contended the judge erred in ordering documentation, discounting medical opinions, determining payment based on the fee schedule, and failing to award penalties for delayed payment. Even if the service defect hadn't occurred, the Board would have denied the petition on its merits based on the judge's report.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.