Home/Case Law/ROBERT LANCASTER vs. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Regular DecisionRemoval

ROBERT LANCASTER vs. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH

Filed: Mar 10, 2008
San Francisco
LBO 333216

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns an applicant police officer who sustained multiple industrial injuries, including spinal, hip, and psychological injuries. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the applicant's petition for removal, recognizing that his case was indefinitely delayed awaiting clarification on injury combination rules. The WCAB's subsequent en banc decision in Benson clarified apportionment requirements, making the prior Wilkinson rule inapplicable and necessitating reconsideration of how the applicant's multiple injuries should be combined and apportioned.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns an applicant police officer who sustained multiple industrial injuries, including spinal, hip, and psychological injuries. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the applicant's petition for removal, recognizing that his case was indefinitely delayed awaiting clarification on injury combination rules. The WCAB's subsequent en banc decision in Benson clarified apportionment requirements, making the prior Wilkinson rule inapplicable and necessitating reconsideration of how the applicant's multiple injuries should be combined and apportioned.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ROBERT LANCASTER vs. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH (2008) – San Francisco | CompFox