Home/Case Law/ROBERT GAONA vs. CAPITAL BUILDERS HARDWARE, SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY, ENDURANCE REINSURANCE CORPORATION
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ROBERT GAONA vs. CAPITAL BUILDERS HARDWARE, SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY, ENDURANCE REINSURANCE CORPORATION

Filed: Mar 24, 2016
Los Angeles
ADJ7 170139; ADJ7176930

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded its prior grant of reconsideration and denied the defendant's petition for removal and reconsideration. The defendant sought to strike the Agreed Medical Evaluator's (AME) psychiatric report due to the applicant allegedly violating Labor Code section 4062.3 by sending a consulting physician's report to the AME without prior agreement. However, the WCAB found that the defendant waived this objection by later submitting both the consulting physician's and the AME's reports to an orthopedic AME for comment. Therefore, the WCAB affirmed the WCJ's denial of the defendant's petition to strike and request for costs and sanctions.

ROBERT GAONA vs. CAPITAL BUILDERS HARDWARE, SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY, ENDURANCE REINSURANCE CORPORATION is a workers' compensation case decided in Los Angeles. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Los Angeles.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded its prior grant of reconsideration and denied the defendant's petition for removal and reconsideration. The defendant sought to strike the Agreed Medical Evaluator's (AME) psychiatric report due to the applicant allegedly violating Labor Code section 4062.3 by sending a consulting physician's report to the AME without prior agreement. However, the WCAB found that the defendant waived this objection by later submitting both the consulting physician's and the AME's reports to an orthopedic AME for comment. Therefore, the WCAB affirmed the WCJ's denial of the defendant's petition to strike and request for costs and sanctions.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ROBERT GAONA vs. CAPITAL BUILDERS HARDWARE, SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY, ENDURANCE REINSURANCE CORPORATION workers compensation case in Los Angeles. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ROBERT GAONA vs. CAPITAL BUILDERS HARDWARE, SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY, ENDURANCE REINSURANCE CORPORATION case law summary from Los Angeles. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ROBERT GAONA vs. CAPITAL BUILDERS HARDWARE, SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY, ENDURANCE REINSURANCE CORPORATION Case Analysis

ROBERT GAONA vs. CAPITAL BUILDERS HARDWARE, SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY, ENDURANCE REINSURANCE CORPORATION is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Los Angeles. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.