CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to correct the date of injury in Robert Enciso's case from February 1, 2009, to January 16, 2009. While Enciso claimed injury to other body parts and sought further benefits, the Board affirmed the original findings that the injury was solely to his left index finger and resulted in no permanent disability or need for further medical treatment. This decision was based on stipulations made by Enciso's former attorney and supported by the medical opinion of Dr. Hakimian. The Board also found that the employer provided proper notice regarding the Medical Provider Network.
Robert Enciso vs. SANTA CLARITA CONCRETE, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to correct the date of injury in Robert Enciso's case from February 1, 2009, to January 16, 2009. While Enciso claimed injury to other body parts and sought further benefits, the Board affirmed the original findings that the injury was solely to his left index finger and resulted in no permanent disability or need for further medical treatment. This decision was based on stipulations made by Enciso's former attorney and supported by the medical opinion of Dr. Hakimian. The Board also found that the employer provided proper notice regarding the Medical Provider Network.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.