CompFox AI Summary
The applicant sought reconsideration of an order approving a compromise and release for bilateral upper extremity injuries. He claimed newly discovered medical evidence warranted setting aside the settlement. The Appeals Board dismissed the petition as premature because no evidence or testimony under oath supported these claims. The Board recommended the judge hold a hearing to allow parties to present evidence regarding good cause to set aside the settlement.
RITO TREVINO vs. COMCAST OF CALIFORNIA/ MASSACHUSETTS/ MICHIGAN/ UTAH, LLC, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. is a workers' compensation case decided in San Jose. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Jose.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The applicant sought reconsideration of an order approving a compromise and release for bilateral upper extremity injuries. He claimed newly discovered medical evidence warranted setting aside the settlement. The Appeals Board dismissed the petition as premature because no evidence or testimony under oath supported these claims. The Board recommended the judge hold a hearing to allow parties to present evidence regarding good cause to set aside the settlement.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.