Home/Case Law/RISHI DHIRI vs. WALGREENS, SEDGWICK
Regular Decision

RISHI DHIRI vs. WALGREENS, SEDGWICK

Filed: Sep 18, 2013
Pomona
ADJ6476038

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a petition for reconsideration filed by the applicant, Rishi Dhiri, against Walgreens and Sedgwick. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed Dhiri's petition because it was filed from an interlocutory order granting reconsideration, not a final order. California law, supported by case precedent, establishes that petitions for reconsideration are only permissible after a final decision or award. The WCAB noted that the Workers' Compensation Judge may consider sanctions for failure to appear.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a petition for reconsideration filed by the applicant, Rishi Dhiri, against Walgreens and Sedgwick. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed Dhiri's petition because it was filed from an interlocutory order granting reconsideration, not a final order. California law, supported by case precedent, establishes that petitions for reconsideration are only permissible after a final decision or award. The WCAB noted that the Workers' Compensation Judge may consider sanctions for failure to appear.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

RISHI DHIRI vs. WALGREENS, SEDGWICK ("201) – Pomona | CompFox