Home/Case Law/RIGOBERTO GARCIA vs. DALE HAMPTON, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

RIGOBERTO GARCIA vs. DALE HAMPTON, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Mar 18, 2008
San Francisco
GRO 0032183

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed a finding of fact denying reimbursement for Wallace & Associates' bill. Applicant failed to prove that these services were reasonable and necessary for his case, as required by Labor Code section 5811 and established precedent. Therefore, the applicant bears the burden of proof for such costs, which was not met.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed a finding of fact denying reimbursement for Wallace & Associates' bill. Applicant failed to prove that these services were reasonable and necessary for his case, as required by Labor Code section 5811 and established precedent. Therefore, the applicant bears the burden of proof for such costs, which was not met.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

RIGOBERTO GARCIA vs. DALE HAMPTON, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND (2008) – San Francisco | CompFox