CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund's (SIBTF) petition for reconsideration. SIBTF argued that medical reports used to establish applicant's industrial disability were inadmissible as they were not obtained through the Labor Code section 4062.2 process. However, the Board found that this process applies to disputes between an employee and employer, not claims against SIBTF, which is not an employer. The Board also rejected SIBTF's claims that pre-existing conditions of GERD, psyche, and addiction were not supported by substantial evidence, upholding the original findings of 65% permanent disability from the industrial injury, compounded by pre-existing disabilities to reach an overall permanent total disability.
RICK BOURISK vs. SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Jose. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Jose.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund's (SIBTF) petition for reconsideration. SIBTF argued that medical reports used to establish applicant's industrial disability were inadmissible as they were not obtained through the Labor Code section 4062.2 process. However, the Board found that this process applies to disputes between an employee and employer, not claims against SIBTF, which is not an employer. The Board also rejected SIBTF's claims that pre-existing conditions of GERD, psyche, and addiction were not supported by substantial evidence, upholding the original findings of 65% permanent disability from the industrial injury, compounded by pre-existing disabilities to reach an overall permanent total disability.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.