Home/Case Law/Richardson v. Astec, Inc.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionCivil Action

Richardson v. Astec, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Rebecca Richardson sued her former employer, Astec, Inc., alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) for unpaid overtime and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) for wrongful termination. Richardson, who worked at Astec for 35 years, was demoted from Accounting Manager to Accounts Payable Manager in 2016 and then terminated at age seventy in 2017. She claims her demotion and termination were due to age discrimination and that she was misclassified as an exempt employee, thus denied overtime. Astec argues she was an exempt employee and terminated for inappropriate behavior. The court denied both Astec's motion for summary judgment and Richardson's motion for partial summary judgment, finding genuine issues of material fact regarding her exempt status under FLSA and whether Astec's reasons for termination were pretextual for age discrimination.

Richardson v. Astec, Inc. is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, E.D. Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, E.D. Tennessee.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Rebecca Richardson sued her former employer, Astec, Inc., alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) for unpaid overtime and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) for wrongful termination. Richardson, who worked at Astec for 35 years, was demoted from Accounting Manager to Accounts Payable Manager in 2016 and then terminated at age seventy in 2017. She claims her demotion and termination were due to age discrimination and that she was misclassified as an exempt employee, thus denied overtime. Astec argues she was an exempt employee and terminated for inappropriate behavior. The court denied both Astec's motion for summary judgment and Richardson's motion for partial summary judgment, finding genuine issues of material fact regarding her exempt status under FLSA and whether Astec's reasons for termination were pretextual for age discrimination.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Richardson v. Astec, Inc. workers compensation case in District Court, E.D. Tennessee. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Richardson v. Astec, Inc. case law summary from District Court, E.D. Tennessee. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Richardson v. Astec, Inc. Case Analysis

Richardson v. Astec, Inc. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in District Court, E.D. Tennessee. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.