CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding apportionment. The Board found that the Agreed Medical Evaluator's opinion on apportionment was substantial medical evidence, despite the administrative law judge's prior rejection. Consequently, the applicant's permanent disability was reduced from 78% to 55% after apportionment to pre-existing conditions. The applicant's petition for reconsideration concerning temporary disability was denied.
RICHARD HOLLAND vs. STATER BROS MARKETS; HARTFORD, SPECIALTY RISK SERVUCES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding apportionment. The Board found that the Agreed Medical Evaluator's opinion on apportionment was substantial medical evidence, despite the administrative law judge's prior rejection. Consequently, the applicant's permanent disability was reduced from 78% to 55% after apportionment to pre-existing conditions. The applicant's petition for reconsideration concerning temporary disability was denied.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.