Home/Case Law/RICHARD HINOJOSA vs. CITY OF RIVERSIDE
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

RICHARD HINOJOSA vs. CITY OF RIVERSIDE

Filed: Sep 05, 2012
Riverside
ADJ7932281

CompFox AI Summary

This case denied the employer's petition for reconsideration of an award for industrial hearing loss. The employer argued the claim was barred by the statute of limitations, but the Board found the applicant did not know or reasonably should have known his hearing loss was work-related before his termination. The applicant's awareness of symptoms alone did not satisfy the legal standard for knowledge of industrial causation. Therefore, the claim was deemed timely under Labor Code section 3600(a)(10).

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case denied the employer's petition for reconsideration of an award for industrial hearing loss. The employer argued the claim was barred by the statute of limitations, but the Board found the applicant did not know or reasonably should have known his hearing loss was work-related before his termination. The applicant's awareness of symptoms alone did not satisfy the legal standard for knowledge of industrial causation. Therefore, the claim was deemed timely under Labor Code section 3600(a)(10).

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.