Home/Case Law/RICHARD HICKS vs. BRAND & HILL PRODUCTIONS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

RICHARD HICKS vs. BRAND & HILL PRODUCTIONS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Jul 21, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ495522

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) affirmed a prior award for temporary disability, permanent disability, medical treatment, and self-procured expenses for a right knee injury sustained in 1999. CIGA sought reconsideration, arguing it was precluded from paying because other insurance was available for a prior cumulative trauma injury. However, the WCAB found no evidence of other insurance being established for the unpleaded and unproven cumulative trauma injury. Therefore, CIGA remains liable for the established claims.

RICHARD HICKS vs. BRAND & HILL PRODUCTIONS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) affirmed a prior award for temporary disability, permanent disability, medical treatment, and self-procured expenses for a right knee injury sustained in 1999. CIGA sought reconsideration, arguing it was precluded from paying because "other insurance" was available for a prior cumulative trauma injury. However, the WCAB found no evidence of "other insurance" being established for the unpleaded and unproven cumulative trauma injury. Therefore, CIGA remains liable for the established claims.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

RICHARD HICKS vs. BRAND & HILL PRODUCTIONS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

RICHARD HICKS vs. BRAND & HILL PRODUCTIONS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

RICHARD HICKS vs. BRAND & HILL PRODUCTIONS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY Case Analysis

RICHARD HICKS vs. BRAND & HILL PRODUCTIONS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.