Home/Case Law/REYNA CASTILLO vs. REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self-Insured
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

REYNA CASTILLO vs. REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self-Insured

Filed: Oct 30, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ2177263 (LBO 0373397) ADJ4605578 (LBO 0373400) ADJ4075010 (LBO 0379292)

CompFox AI Summary

The Petition for Reconsideration is dismissed because it was untimely filed and because the Lien Claimant failed to meet its burden of proof.

REYNA CASTILLO vs. REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self-Insured is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Petition for Reconsideration is dismissed because it was untimely filed and because the Lien Claimant failed to meet its burden of proof.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

REYNA CASTILLO vs. REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self-Insured workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

REYNA CASTILLO vs. REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self-Insured case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

REYNA CASTILLO vs. REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self-Insured Case Analysis

REYNA CASTILLO vs. REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self-Insured is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.