Home/Case Law/RENEGARCIA vs. CITY OF ANAHEIM, PRESSURE
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

RENEGARCIA vs. CITY OF ANAHEIM, PRESSURE

Filed: Feb 12, 2013
ADJ2786471 (AHM 0131183)

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board rescinded the prior award due to the physician's flawed methodology in determining permanent disability. The physician improperly used the Almaraz/Guzman analysis by considering both functional capacity and ability to compete in the labor market. Furthermore, the physician's supplemental report failed to correct this error and used speculative cumulative losses. The matter is returned for a new rating strictly applying the AMA Guides.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board rescinded the prior award due to the physician's flawed methodology in determining permanent disability. The physician improperly used the Almaraz/Guzman analysis by considering both functional capacity and ability to compete in the labor market. Furthermore, the physician's supplemental report failed to correct this error and used speculative cumulative losses. The matter is returned for a new rating strictly applying the AMA Guides.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

RENEGARCIA vs. CITY OF ANAHEIM, PRESSURE (2013) – | CompFox