CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration concerning an applicant's psychiatric injury claim. The WCJ had previously found the injury compensable and not barred by the post-termination defense. The defendant argued they had no notice of the psychiatric injury prior to termination, and the WCJ's report introduced the "sudden and extraordinary" event defense for the first time. The Board granted reconsideration to allow the defendant to respond to this new issue, pending further proceedings.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration concerning an applicant's psychiatric injury claim. The WCJ had previously found the injury compensable and not barred by the post-termination defense. The defendant argued they had no notice of the psychiatric injury prior to termination, and the WCJ's report introduced the "sudden and extraordinary" event defense for the first time. The Board granted reconsideration to allow the defendant to respond to this new issue, pending further proceedings.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.