Home/Case Law/REGINA RUIZ vs. MARK MURRAY, STATE FARM INSURANCE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

REGINA RUIZ vs. MARK MURRAY, STATE FARM INSURANCE

Filed: Oct 26, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ6757683

CompFox AI Summary

The WCJ's decisions of June 30, 2009 and July 29, 2009 are RESCINDED, and this matter is RETURNED to the trial level for further proceedings and new decision by the WCJ, consistent with this opinion. The dispute over the medications Soma and Lidoderm must be referred to a panel QME.

REGINA RUIZ vs. MARK MURRAY, STATE FARM INSURANCE is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The WCJ's decisions of June 30, 2009 and July 29, 2009 are RESCINDED, and this matter is RETURNED to the trial level for further proceedings and new decision by the WCJ, consistent with this opinion. The dispute over the medications Soma and Lidoderm must be referred to a panel QME.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

REGINA RUIZ vs. MARK MURRAY, STATE FARM INSURANCE workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

REGINA RUIZ vs. MARK MURRAY, STATE FARM INSURANCE case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

REGINA RUIZ vs. MARK MURRAY, STATE FARM INSURANCE Case Analysis

REGINA RUIZ vs. MARK MURRAY, STATE FARM INSURANCE is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.