Home/Case Law/REGINA ROSS vs. ALAN and IRENE SMITH, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Legally Uninsured, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, IHSS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND ADJUSTING AGENT
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

REGINA ROSS vs. ALAN and IRENE SMITH, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Legally Uninsured, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, IHSS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND ADJUSTING AGENT

Filed: Mar 29, 2012
San Francisco
ADJ7244058

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a defendant's petition for reconsideration of a workers' compensation award. The defendant argued the temporary disability rate was incorrect, $391.28, when admitted earnings supported a lower rate of $260.86. The administrative law judge corrected this clerical error on the same day the petition was filed, within the allowed 15-day period. Therefore, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition as moot, as the error was timely cured by the judge.

REGINA ROSS vs. ALAN and IRENE SMITH, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Legally Uninsured, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, IHSS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND ADJUSTING AGENT is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a defendant's petition for reconsideration of a workers' compensation award. The defendant argued the temporary disability rate was incorrect, $391.28, when admitted earnings supported a lower rate of $260.86. The administrative law judge corrected this clerical error on the same day the petition was filed, within the allowed 15-day period. Therefore, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition as moot, as the error was timely cured by the judge.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

REGINA ROSS vs. ALAN and IRENE SMITH, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Legally Uninsured, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, IHSS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND ADJUSTING AGENT workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

REGINA ROSS vs. ALAN and IRENE SMITH, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Legally Uninsured, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, IHSS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND ADJUSTING AGENT case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

REGINA ROSS vs. ALAN and IRENE SMITH, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Legally Uninsured, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, IHSS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND ADJUSTING AGENT Case Analysis

REGINA ROSS vs. ALAN and IRENE SMITH, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Legally Uninsured, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, IHSS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND ADJUSTING AGENT is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.