CompFox AI Summary
In Mubvakure v. Starbucks, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a decision concerning lien claimant Injury Center Medical Group. The Board determined reconsideration was necessary to thoroughly review the factual and legal issues, ensuring a just and reasoned outcome. All future filings related to the petition for reconsideration must be submitted directly to the Appeals Board Commissioners, not the district office or e-filed. This prevents the trial judge from acting on settlements while the case is pending before the Board.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
In Mubvakure v. Starbucks, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a decision concerning lien claimant Injury Center Medical Group. The Board determined reconsideration was necessary to thoroughly review the factual and legal issues, ensuring a just and reasoned outcome. All future filings related to the petition for reconsideration must be submitted directly to the Appeals Board Commissioners, not the district office or e-filed. This prevents the trial judge from acting on settlements while the case is pending before the Board.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.