Home/Case Law/RAY WRIGHT vs. MITCHELL CONCRETE, APPLIED RISK OMAHA
Regular Decision

RAY WRIGHT vs. MITCHELL CONCRETE, APPLIED RISK OMAHA

Filed: Nov 03, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ1700987

CompFox AI Summary

The defendant sought removal of a WCJ's finding that an orthopedic QME was not authorized to select an internal medicine QME, arguing Administrative Director Rule 32 permitted it. The Appeals Board denied the petition for removal. Removal is an extraordinary remedy granted only upon a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, which the defendant failed to demonstrate. The Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning and concluded reconsideration would be an adequate remedy.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The defendant sought removal of a WCJ's finding that an orthopedic QME was not authorized to select an internal medicine QME, arguing Administrative Director Rule 32 permitted it. The Appeals Board denied the petition for removal. Removal is an extraordinary remedy granted only upon a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, which the defendant failed to demonstrate. The Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning and concluded reconsideration would be an adequate remedy.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.