Home/Case Law/RAUL ALDAZ vs. SAN BERNARDINO STEEL, MATRIX
Regular DecisionReconsideration

RAUL ALDAZ vs. SAN BERNARDINO STEEL, MATRIX

Filed: Jun 01, 2012
San Francisco
ADJ3479900 (POM 0272059) ADJ3173924 (POM 0272060) ADJ1790357 (POM 0272061)

CompFox AI Summary

Here's a summary of the case for a lawyer, in four sentences:

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed a lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as untimely, as it was filed more than 25 days after the Joint Findings and Order. The Board adopted the administrative law judge's report, which found the petition failed to comply with procedural requirements, including proper filing and referencing supporting evidence. The ALJ also concluded that the lien claimant's evidence did not establish liability for the medical evaluation in question. Therefore, the Board ordered the Petition for Reconsideration dismissed.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Here's a summary of the case for a lawyer, in four sentences:

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed a lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as untimely, as it was filed more than 25 days after the Joint Findings and Order. The Board adopted the administrative law judge's report, which found the petition failed to comply with procedural requirements, including proper filing and referencing supporting evidence. The ALJ also concluded that the lien claimant's evidence did not establish liability for the medical evaluation in question. Therefore, the Board ordered the Petition for Reconsideration dismissed.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

RAUL ALDAZ vs. SAN BERNARDINO STEEL, MATRIX (2012) – San Francisco | CompFox