CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed the WCJ's finding that the applicant was permanent and stationary on June 1, 2009. The Board found the Agreed Medical Evaluator's (AME) opinion more persuasive, concluding the applicant was not yet permanent and stationary due to ongoing recovery from knee surgery. Consequently, temporary disability benefits are awarded through October 26, 2009, with further proceedings to determine benefits thereafter.
RANDY TEMPLE vs. RUDOLPH AND SLETTEN AND NUFICO OF PITTSBURGH, PA., CHARTIS SAN RAMON is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed the WCJ's finding that the applicant was permanent and stationary on June 1, 2009. The Board found the Agreed Medical Evaluator's (AME) opinion more persuasive, concluding the applicant was not yet permanent and stationary due to ongoing recovery from knee surgery. Consequently, temporary disability benefits are awarded through October 26, 2009, with further proceedings to determine benefits thereafter.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.