Home/Case Law/RANDY SPENCER vs. RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, Permissibly Self-Insured
Regular DecisionReconsideration

RANDY SPENCER vs. RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, Permissibly Self-Insured

Filed: Nov 04, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ1634978 / LAO 794002

CompFox AI Summary

Reconsideration denied. WCJ's decision supported by substantial evidence. Apportionment not warranted; applicant's testimony credible.

RANDY SPENCER vs. RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, Permissibly Self-Insured is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Reconsideration denied. WCJ's decision supported by substantial evidence. Apportionment not warranted; applicant's testimony credible.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

RANDY SPENCER vs. RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, Permissibly Self-Insured workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

RANDY SPENCER vs. RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, Permissibly Self-Insured case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

RANDY SPENCER vs. RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, Permissibly Self-Insured Case Analysis

RANDY SPENCER vs. RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, Permissibly Self-Insured is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.