CompFox AI Summary
The applicant sought reconsideration of an order dismissing her workers' compensation case for lack of prosecution, arguing she was homeless and did not receive notice. While the Board dismissed her petition for reconsideration as the order was not final, it granted removal of the case. The Board found that the applicant would suffer prejudice if the dismissal stood without addressing her lack of notice claim due to homelessness. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The applicant sought reconsideration of an order dismissing her workers' compensation case for lack of prosecution, arguing she was homeless and did not receive notice. While the Board dismissed her petition for reconsideration as the order was not final, it granted removal of the case. The Board found that the applicant would suffer prejudice if the dismissal stood without addressing her lack of notice claim due to homelessness. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.