CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration of a WCJ's order allowing a third deposition of an Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME), as the order was not final. The WCAB granted removal and rescinded the order, returning the cases to the WCJ to issue rating instructions and obtain permanent disability ratings for the applicant's two distinct industrial injuries. The WCAB affirmed that the AME's apportionment determination regarding the applicant's spinal injury constituted substantial evidence and would not be revisited. However, one commissioner dissented, arguing that further development of the record was needed regarding the AME's apportionment of the applicant's internal injuries.
RANDAL DELAO vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration of a WCJ's order allowing a third deposition of an Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME), as the order was not final. The WCAB granted removal and rescinded the order, returning the cases to the WCJ to issue rating instructions and obtain permanent disability ratings for the applicant's two distinct industrial injuries. The WCAB affirmed that the AME's apportionment determination regarding the applicant's spinal injury constituted substantial evidence and would not be revisited. However, one commissioner dissented, arguing that further development of the record was needed regarding the AME's apportionment of the applicant's internal injuries.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.