CompFox AI Summary
Jack D. Ramsey, a driver for Averitt Express, Inc., sought expedited hearing benefits for a work-related low back injury sustained after slipping on ice. The Court found that Averitt's provided panel of orthopedists did not fully comply with statutory requirements, effectively limiting Mr. Ramsey's choice of physician. An authorized physician, Dr. Mark Gillespy, concluded Mr. Ramsey's condition was partially work-related, placed him at maximum medical improvement (MMI) with a three-percent impairment, and stated he could no longer work as a driver. Mr. Ramsey subsequently sought unauthorized medical treatment. The Court denied Mr. Ramsey's requests for reimbursement of unauthorized medical expenses and temporary disability benefits, ordering Averitt to provide a new panel of orthopedists in compliance with state law.
Ramsey, Jack D. v. Averitt Express, Inc. is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Jack D. Ramsey, a driver for Averitt Express, Inc., sought expedited hearing benefits for a work-related low back injury sustained after slipping on ice. The Court found that Averitt's provided panel of orthopedists did not fully comply with statutory requirements, effectively limiting Mr. Ramsey's choice of physician. An authorized physician, Dr. Mark Gillespy, concluded Mr. Ramsey's condition was partially work-related, placed him at maximum medical improvement (MMI) with a three-percent impairment, and stated he could no longer work as a driver. Mr. Ramsey subsequently sought unauthorized medical treatment. The Court denied Mr. Ramsey's requests for reimbursement of unauthorized medical expenses and temporary disability benefits, ordering Averitt to provide a new panel of orthopedists in compliance with state law.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.