CompFox AI Summary
The applicant sought reconsideration of a decision finding no industrial injury to his spine. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the original decision. The Board deferred to the administrative law judge's credibility findings, which found the applicant's testimony unreliable and non-credible. Conversely, the defense witnesses' testimony was deemed reliable and consistent, supporting the denial of the claim.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The applicant sought reconsideration of a decision finding no industrial injury to his spine. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the original decision. The Board deferred to the administrative law judge's credibility findings, which found the applicant's testimony unreliable and non-credible. Conversely, the defense witnesses' testimony was deemed reliable and consistent, supporting the denial of the claim.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.