Home/Case Law/RAMON MAGANA vs. STANFORD UNIVERSITY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION By Its Servicing Facility INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICES, For RELIANCE INSURANCE, In Liquidation
Regular DecisionReconsideration

RAMON MAGANA vs. STANFORD UNIVERSITY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION By Its Servicing Facility INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICES, For RELIANCE INSURANCE, In Liquidation

Filed: Mar 09, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ2887074 (SFO 0429767) ADJ3128893 (SFO 0451527)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a dispute over temporary total disability (TTD) benefits for an applicant with right knee and leg injuries. The defendant, CIGA, sought reconsideration of a WCJ's award of continuing TTD, arguing the applicant's condition was permanent and stationary by a specific date and that jurisdiction for TTD had expired. The Appeals Board found the medical evidence regarding the applicant's current TTD status and the commencement/duration of such disability to be insufficient. Consequently, the Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's decision, and returned the matter for further development of the medical record, potentially through an Agreed Medical Evaluator or court-appointed physician.

RAMON MAGANA vs. STANFORD UNIVERSITY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION By Its Servicing Facility INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICES, For RELIANCE INSURANCE, In Liquidation is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a dispute over temporary total disability (TTD) benefits for an applicant with right knee and leg injuries. The defendant, CIGA, sought reconsideration of a WCJ's award of continuing TTD, arguing the applicant's condition was permanent and stationary by a specific date and that jurisdiction for TTD had expired. The Appeals Board found the medical evidence regarding the applicant's current TTD status and the commencement/duration of such disability to be insufficient. Consequently, the Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's decision, and returned the matter for further development of the medical record, potentially through an Agreed Medical Evaluator or court-appointed physician.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

RAMON MAGANA vs. STANFORD UNIVERSITY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION By Its Servicing Facility INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICES, For RELIANCE INSURANCE, In Liquidation workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

RAMON MAGANA vs. STANFORD UNIVERSITY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION By Its Servicing Facility INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICES, For RELIANCE INSURANCE, In Liquidation case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

RAMON MAGANA vs. STANFORD UNIVERSITY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION By Its Servicing Facility INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICES, For RELIANCE INSURANCE, In Liquidation Case Analysis

RAMON MAGANA vs. STANFORD UNIVERSITY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION By Its Servicing Facility INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICES, For RELIANCE INSURANCE, In Liquidation is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.