Home/Case Law/RAMIRO ESPINOZA vs. BALDWIN CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

RAMIRO ESPINOZA vs. BALDWIN CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Aug 21, 2018
San Bernardino
ADJ9427419

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns whether Reshealth Medical Group's lien is subject to a stay under Labor Code section 4615 due to the criminal indictment of Eric Schames. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded the prior finding that the lien was stayed, finding insufficient evidence that Schames controlled Reshealth Medical Group as an officer, director, or 10% shareholder. The Board determined the defendant failed to meet its burden of proof and returned the case for further proceedings to clarify Schames' affiliation and the application of the controlled entity definition.

RAMIRO ESPINOZA vs. BALDWIN CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Bernardino. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Bernardino.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns whether Reshealth Medical Group's lien is subject to a stay under Labor Code section 4615 due to the criminal indictment of Eric Schames. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded the prior finding that the lien was stayed, finding insufficient evidence that Schames controlled Reshealth Medical Group as an officer, director, or 10% shareholder. The Board determined the defendant failed to meet its burden of proof and returned the case for further proceedings to clarify Schames' affiliation and the application of the "controlled entity" definition.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

RAMIRO ESPINOZA vs. BALDWIN CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in San Bernardino. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

RAMIRO ESPINOZA vs. BALDWIN CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from San Bernardino. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

RAMIRO ESPINOZA vs. BALDWIN CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

RAMIRO ESPINOZA vs. BALDWIN CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Bernardino. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.