CompFox AI Summary
Defendant Sears Holding Corporation sought to terminate liability for home healthcare services, challenging a prior WCJ order that found no good cause to do so. The original order, based on a stipulation, required reimbursement for up to 10 hours per week of home healthcare at $15/hour. The defendant's petition was denied because the prior order was deemed final and res judicata, predating SB 863's amendments to home healthcare provisions. The defendant failed to demonstrate good cause, such as a change in the applicant's medical condition, to modify or terminate the existing award. The Appeals Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning, emphasizing that the burden is on the defendant to show why the services are no longer needed, a burden not met here.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Defendant Sears Holding Corporation sought to terminate liability for home healthcare services, challenging a prior WCJ order that found no good cause to do so. The original order, based on a stipulation, required reimbursement for up to 10 hours per week of home healthcare at $15/hour. The defendant's petition was denied because the prior order was deemed final and res judicata, predating SB 863's amendments to home healthcare provisions. The defendant failed to demonstrate good cause, such as a change in the applicant's medical condition, to modify or terminate the existing award. The Appeals Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning, emphasizing that the burden is on the defendant to show why the services are no longer needed, a burden not met here.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.